Références bibliographiques utilisées dans le cadre du projet :

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Psychology of learning and motivation, 2, 89-195.

Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 811-820.

Ayres, P., Marcus, N., Chan, C., & Qian, N. (2009). Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 348-353.

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, Angleterre : Oxford University Press.

Brown, L. A., Lohr, L. L., Gall, J. E., & Ursyn, A. (2013). Where is the design in instructional design? The role of visual aesthetics in the field. In Educational media and technology yearbook (pp. 7-25). New York, NY: Springer.

Brunyé, T. T., Taylor, H. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2008). Repetition and dual coding in procedural multimedia presentations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 877-895.

Campbell, J., Mayer, R. E., Farmer, L., & Fennell, S. (2004). Personalization Effect in Multimedia Learning: Students Learn Better When Words Are in Conversational Style Rather Than Formal Style. Journal of educational psychology, 96(2), 389-395.

Crowder, R. G. (1982). The demise of short-term memory. Acta Psychologica,50(3), 291-323.

Boucheix, J. M., & Lowe, R. K. (2010). An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and instruction, 20(2), 123-135.

de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2007). Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 731-746.

de Koning, B.B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R.M.J.P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 113-140

Gyselinck, V., Cornoldi, C., Dubois, V., De Beni, R., & Ehrlich, M. F. (2002). Visuospatial memory and phonological loop in learning from multimedia. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(6), 665-685.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (p. 41-58). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 414.

Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and instruction, 21(4), 209-249.

Hegarty, M., & Kriz, S. (2008). Effects of Knowledge and Spatial  Ability on Learning from Animation. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Ed.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (p.3-29). New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.

Höffler, T. N., & Schwartz, R. N. (2011). Effects of pacing and cognitive style across dynamic and non-dynamic representations. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1716-1726.

Imhof, B., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2011). Learning about locomotion patterns from visualizations: Effects of presentation format and realism. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1961-1970.

Jamet, E. (2008). Peut-on concevoir des documents électroniques plus efficaces? L’exemple des diaporamas. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 58(3), 185-198.

Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied cognitive psychology, 13(4), 351-371.

Kombartzky, U., Ploetzner, R., Schlag, S., & Metz, B. (2010). Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animations. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 424-433.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.

Lohr, L. (2008). Creating graphics for learning and performance: Lessons in visual literacy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Lowe, R., & Schnotz, W. (Eds.). (2008). Learning with animation: Research implications for design. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mason, L., Lowe, R., & Tornatora, M. C. (2013). Self-generated drawings for supporting comprehension of a complex animation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 211-224.

Mayer, R. E. (2008). Research-Based Principles for Learning with Animation. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (p. 30-48). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171-173.

Mayer, R.E. (2014). Introduction to Multimedia Learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (p. 1-26). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R.E. (2014). Principles Based on Social Cues in Multimedia Learning: Personalization, Voice, Image, and Embodiment Principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (p. 345-370). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages?. Journal of educational psychology, 93(2), 390.

Mayer, R.E. & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (p. 279-315). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E., Mathias, A., & Wetzell, K. (2002). Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(3), 147.

Mayer, R.E.  & Pilegard, C. (2014). Principles for Managing Essential Processing in Multimedia Learning: Segmenting, Pre-training, and Modality Principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (p. 316-344). New-York: Cambridge University Press

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.

Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 149–158.

Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the methodaffects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 149–158

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 165.

Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. New York, NY : Addison-Wesley.

Paas, F., Van Gerven, P. W., & Wouters, P. (2007). Instructional efficiency of animation: Effects of interactivity through mental reconstruction of static key frames. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 783-793.

Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255.

Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2012). A systematic characterisation of expository animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 781–794.

Ploetzner, R., Lowe, R., & Schlag, S. (2013). A systematic characterization of cognitive techniques for learning from textual and pictorial representations. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(2), 78.

Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New-York, NY: CSLI Publications and Cambridge University press.

Robin, D., Hugues, P., Tricot, A., & Zafiharimalala, H. (2011). La ressemblance a encore frappé! Effets de l’iconicité sur des tâches d’apprentissage en maintenance aéronautique. In Actes de la conférence EIAH 2011 (p. 315-327)

Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Huk, T., Imhof, B., & Kammerer, Y. (2009). The effects of realism in learning with dynamic visualizations. Learning and Instruction, 19, 481–494

Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Schuh, J. (2010). The acquisition of problem-solving skills in mathematics: How animations can aid understanding of structural problem features and solution procedures. Instructional Science, 38(5), 487–502.

Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 74(11), 1.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.

Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: can it facilitate?. International journal of human-computer studies, 57(4), 247-262.

van Gog, T. (2014). The Signaling (or cueing) principle in multimedia learning.  In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (p. 43-71). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. Handbook of research on teaching, 3, 315-327.

Williams, R. (2008). The non-designer’s design book. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit.

Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational psychologist, 24(4), 345-376.